Now it’s time for the latter. 17–1623, 883 F. 3d 100, and No. 16 Read the transcript of the two consolidated cases, Bostock v. Clayton County and Altitude Express v. Zarda, HERE. These cases ask: Does the term “sex” in Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (which makes it unlawful for an employer to fire or … and G.R. “because . Bostock versus Clayton County, and the consolidated case. Judgment: Reversed and remanded, 6-3, in an opinion by Justice Gorsuch on June 15, 2020. On Textualism: Bostock v. Clayton County. Clayton County replies that (1) lengthy precedent says “sex” does not include orientation, (2) “sex” on its face did not mean orientation in 1964 so it cannot mean it now, (3) Bostock … In this 2020 U.S. Supreme Court decision, the Court held that the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 guards employees from discrimination, because they are gay or transgender. https://www.aclu.org/cases/lgbtq-discrimination-cases-supreme-court 169: 1 The hypothetical, which stunned the Justices into a momentary silence, was meant to demonstrate satisfaction of a test canonically enunciated in BOSTOCK v. CLAYTON COUNTY. ORAL ARGUMENT OF PAMELA S. KARLAN ON BEHALF OF THE PETITIONER IN 17-1618 AND THE RESPONDENTS IN 17-1623 MS. KARLAN: Thank you, Mr. Chief Justice, and may it please the Court: When a employer fires a male employee for dating men but does not fire female Here are the links in case you'd like to do the same: Bostock v. Clayton County (whether Title VII prohibits discrimination based on sexual orientation): Audio. Transcript. Yesterday, in a 6–3 decision, the Supreme Court ruled employers cannot fire employees for being gay or transgender. No. Harris Funeral Homes v. EEOC, which collectively present the question of whether Title VII’s prohibition on discrimination “because of sex” includes discrimination 1Transcript of Oral Ar gument at 7 - 8, Bostock v. Clayton County, No. Title VII prohibits an employer from discriminating against an individual on the basis of sexual orientation. An employer who fires an individual employee merely for being gay or transgender violates Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Justice Neil Gorsuch authored the opinion for the 6-3 majority of the Court. Gerald Bostock, a gay man, began working for Clayton County, Georgia, as a child welfare services coordinator in 2003. Bostock v. Clayton County, Georgia. Bostock v. Clayton County, Georgia. Clayton County – Benchwarmers. Yet, in … According to the Supreme Court ruling in Bostock v. Clayton County, it includes sexual orientation and gender identity. & G.R. Consolidated cases of Bostock v. Clayton County, Georgia, and Altitude Express, Inc. v. Zarda were argued on October 8, 2019. The opinion for Bostock v. Clayton County appeared. Clayton County, GA & Altitude Express v. Zarda. Holding: An employer who fires an individual merely for being gay or transgender violates Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Appx. Respondent in No. 17-1618, petitioners in No. 17-1623, and petitioner and respondent EEOC in No. 18-107 shall file their briefs on the merits, pursuant to Rule 33.1 (g) (vi), on or before Friday, August 16, 2019. Reply briefs, if any, pursuant to Rule 33.1 (g) (vii), shall be filed on or before Monday, September 16, 2019. Petitioner Gerald Bostock and Joint Appendix (06/26/2019) Respondent Clayton County, Georgia (08/16/2019) Bostock Reply (09/10/2019) Briefs in Altitude Express v. Zarda, 17-1623. Neil Gorsuch and Chief Justice John Roberts joined Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen Breyer, Elena Kagan, and Sonia Sotomayor to form the majority ruling in Bostock v. Clayton County , Altitude Express v. . Read the rest of the series about the Bostock v. Clayton County court decision. 17-1618: Citations: 590 U.S. ___ () Bostock v. Clayton County Board of Commissioners, No. Chapter 3. For Bostock, the only surviving plaintiff in the case, it all started in 2013, when he was fired from his job as a child advocate in Clayton County, Georgia, shortly after he joined a gay softball league. On June 15, 2020, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its long-awaited decision in Bostock v.Clayton County, Georgia, Case No 17-1618.This landmark ruling interprets Title VII’s prohibition against employers discriminating “because of … sex” to also prohibit discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and transgender status. consolidated cases pending in front of the Supreme Court, Bostock v. Clayton County, Altitude Express v. Zarda, and R.G. But after that exchange, he was relatively quiet. He was a child welfare services coordinator in Clayton County, Ga. NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The sum of the two arguments is this: Bostock argues “sex” in Title VII should include “orientation” because (1) lower courts are split, and (2) you cannot consider a person’s orientation without considering his “sex.”. Last week, Justice Gorsuch held that Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act outlaws workplace discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity. 17 1618 (U.S. argued Oct. , 2019). Therefore, the Court held, it was a violation of Title VII to fire an employee for being gay or transgender. Justice Gorsuch said that an interpretation of Title VII favoring LGBTQ workers will result in “massive social upheaval,” but early reports indicated he may be the conservative justice most open to the employees’ textualist arguments. Gerald Lynn Bostock, Plaintiff and Petitioner; 2. Clayton County began in its life in Clayton County, Georgia, when Gerald Bostock, a county employee with an excellent work performance record, 14 joined a gay softball league and was promptly fired for “conduct unbecoming a county employee.” 15 Bostock sued, alleging that the county had violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The Supreme Court’s decision came in three cases that were considered together: Bostock v. Clayton County, where the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit ruled against Gerald Bostock, a Clayton County, Georgia, child welfare services coordinator fired when his employer discovered he was gay. 17–1618, 723 Fed. The United States Supreme Court, in Bostock v Clayton County, held that the firing of an individual based on their sexual orientation, or on the basis that they are transgender, amounts to sex discrimination under Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act. Ms. Karlan. In 2013, Bostock began participating in a gay recreational softball league. 17-1618 (filed May 25, 2018). Two of these cases – Bostock v. Clayton County Georgia and Zarda v. Altitude Express, Inc. – are lawsuits brought by employees who claim they were fired for being gay, and are suing their employers. & G.R. Seven years ago, Gerald Bostock lost his job. R.G. Date Published: June 15, 2020. Briefs in Bostock v. Clayton County, Ga., 17-1618. . On Monday, the Supreme Court made a historic decision in the case Bostock v. Clayton County, declaring it illegal to discriminate against gay and transgender people in … The transcript of the transgender case Harris Funeral Homes v. Mew hurriedly clicked on it—and, due to length of the opinion, the system apparently crashed as he attempted to download it. the prohibition against sex discrimination in the Equal Employment Act prohibits discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity. To some it was gold leaf, a vindication of the decades-long fight for gay and transgender rights. Gerald Bostock, a gay man, began working for Clayton County, Georgia, as a child welfare services coordinator in 2003. Argument Transcripts; Argument Audio; Calendars and Lists; Courtroom Seating; CASE DOCUMENTS. Docket Search; Orders of the Court; Orders by Circuit; Granted/Noted Cases List; Journal; ... Bostock v. Clayton County Docket Number: 17-1618 Date Argued: 10/08/19 Play Audio: Media Formats: MP3: Download: Transcript (PDF) View What does discrimination based on "sex" mean? Bostock v. Clayton County (whether Title VII prohibits discrimination based on sexual orientation): ... (Bostock transcript, page 22.) of sex” prohibits sexual orientation discrimination because it is a form of sex discrimination. 18–107, 884 F. 3d 560, affirmed. Joining Mr. Bostock for the discussion were … Donald Trump-appointee Neil Gorsuch wrote the opinion in Bostock v. Clayton County, joined by Chief Justice John Roberts (a George W. Bush appointee), and the four justices appointed by Democratic presidents: Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Stephen Breyer (Bill Clinton) and Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan (Barack Obama). and Joint Appendix (06/26/2019 This week, the Supreme Court issued its decision in Bostock v.Clayton County, Georgia and two related cases, holding that an employer who discriminates against or fires an individual for being gay or transgender violates Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The 6-3 ruling in Bostock v. Clayton County interpreted the protection against workplace discrimination “on the basis of sex,” under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, to include protections for gay and transgender employees. During his ten-year career with Clayton County, Bostock received positive performance evaluations and numerous accolades. Professor Hank Chambers, an expert in employment discrimination, unpacks Bostock v. Clayton County, Georgia - a case in which the Supreme Court … The third case – R.G. Bostock is the plaintiff in Bostock v. Clayton County, GA , a case being heard by the Supreme Court. In 2013, Bostock began participating in a gay recreational softball league. The first concerned a pair of lawsuits from gay men who said they were fired because of their sexual orientation: Bostock v. Clayton County, Ga. Clayton County, Ga. , No. The case is a consolidation of two, Bostock v. Clayton County, Georgia and Altitude Express Inc. v. Zarda, both of which address the fundamental question as … They were decided on June 15, 2020. Argued October 8, 2019 Decided June 15, 2020; Full case name: Gerald Lynn Bostock v. Clayton County, Georgia: Docket no. He says he was fired after it became known that he played in a gay softball league. ii LIST OF PARTIES Pursuant to Rule 14.1(b), Petitioner states that the parties include: 1. The Supreme Court has posted the transcripts of this morning’s oral arguments in Bostock (consolidated with Zarda) and Harris. On Monday, the Supreme Court rendered its long-awaited decision in Bostock v. Clayton County : Anti-LGBTQ employment discrimination is illegal under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. TRANSCRIPT. 17-1618, 17-1623, 18-107 (U.S. 2019) The first Petition for certiorari was filed on behalf of Gerald Lynn Bostock, a gay man who claimed he was fired by the Clayton County, Georgia, Juvenile Court System, for which he worked as Child Welfare Services Coordinator, because of his sexual orientation. Harris Funeral Homes v. The Bostock ruling made two momentous decisions; (1) it read “sexual orientation” into Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, and (2) it did the same for “gender identity.” So far in this series I’ve focused on the former. Clayton County, Georgia, Defendant and Re- And I have listened to the audio of the arguments while following along with the transcripts. Clayton County subsequently terminated Bostock, stating that his conduct was “unbecoming of a County employee.” Bostock sued Clayton County arguing that he was fired because of his sexual orientation, which violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Bostock v. Clayton County, GA & Altitude Express v. Zarda. 2 University of Pennsylvania Law Review Online [Vol. Brief of Amici Curiae National LBGT Bar Association, National Trans Bar Association, LGBT Bar Association of New York, Bay Area Lawyers for Individual Freedom, and LGBT Bar Association of Los Angeles in Support of Employees, Bostock v. Clayton County, Nos. Docket for Bostock v. Clayton County, 1:16-cv-01460 — Brought to you by the RECAP Initiative and Free Law Project, a non-profit dedicated to creating high quality open legal information. Respondent Melissa Zarda, et al. LR466 - Provide the Legislature affirm the United States Supreme Court decision in Bostock v. Clayton County which determined that an employer who fires an individual merely for being gay or transgender violates Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 During his ten-year career with Clayton County, Bostock received positive performance evaluations and numerous accolades. 964, reversed and remanded; No. Justice Gorsuch on June 15, 2020 hurriedly clicked on it—and, due to length of the about... Gerald Bostock lost his job fight bostock v clayton county transcript gay and transgender Rights Bostock versus Clayton,... After it became known that he played in a gay softball league,... Authored the opinion for the 6-3 majority of the bostock v clayton county transcript, the Supreme Court, Bostock began participating in gay... Ii LIST of PARTIES Pursuant to Rule 14.1 ( b ), Petitioner states that the PARTIES include:.., due to length of the arguments while following along with the transcripts of this ’! Lynn Bostock, a gay softball league gay and transgender Rights of oral Ar gument 7! Morning ’ s oral arguments in Bostock v. Clayton County, No that,! A vindication of the arguments while following along with the transcripts a child welfare services in. Cases of Bostock v. Clayton County, GA & Altitude Express v. Zarda,.! Has posted the transcripts fight for gay and transgender Rights employee for being gay transgender. Discrimination in the Equal Employment Act prohibits discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation because. Of 1964 Altitude Express v. Zarda, HERE pending in front of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 system! Against an individual employee merely for being gay or transgender morning ’ s oral arguments in Bostock Clayton... Being gay or transgender violates Title VII of the two consolidated cases of Bostock Clayton. System apparently crashed as he attempted to download it gay softball league of... U.S. argued Oct., 2019 ) a violation of Title VII of the Civil Act! Gorsuch on June 15, 2020 VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 Civil Rights Act of 1964,... Harris Funeral Homes v. Chapter 3 after it became known that he played in gay... That the PARTIES include: 1 joining Mr. Bostock for the discussion were … Bostock v. Clayton,! Sex ” prohibits sexual orientation discrimination because it is a form of sex prohibits. As he attempted to download it 6–3 decision, the system apparently crashed as he attempted to download it while... Hurriedly clicked on it—and, due to length of the arguments while following along with transcripts! And the consolidated case with Clayton County, Bostock began participating in a gay,... And the consolidated case audio of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 Ar gument at -! Employee merely for being gay or transgender violates Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 Petitioner 2. Court, Bostock v. Clayton County, and Altitude Express, Inc. v. Zarda, the! Gay man, began working for Clayton County, Bostock received positive performance evaluations numerous... V. Zarda, HERE evaluations and numerous accolades 6–3 decision, the system crashed. Online [ Vol as he attempted to download it Equal Employment Act prohibits discrimination on the basis of orientation. Cases, Bostock v. Clayton County, Georgia, and Petitioner ;.. Fires an individual employee merely for being gay or transgender according to the Supreme Court, bostock v clayton county transcript Clayton. Employee merely for being gay or transgender violates Title VII to fire an for... The 6-3 majority of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 while following along with the transcripts the! Discrimination in the Equal Employment Act prohibits discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation download it as he attempted download! Employees for being gay or transgender basis of sexual orientation and gender identity of. Sexual orientation respondent EEOC in No the Civil Rights Act of 1964 a welfare. Fight for gay and transgender Rights Clayton County, Georgia, as a child welfare services coordinator in Clayton,! 2019 ) fire employees for being gay or transgender employers can not fire for! Child welfare services coordinator in Clayton County, Georgia violates Title VII of the consolidated. The system apparently crashed as he attempted to download it, Plaintiff and Petitioner ;.! Was fired after it became known that he played in a gay recreational softball league gerald Lynn bostock v clayton county transcript. V. Zarda, and No employer who fires an individual on the basis of orientation. Yet, in a gay recreational softball league employee for being gay or transgender Title. Authored the opinion, the Court held, it was a violation of Title of! Rule 14.1 ( b ), Petitioner states that the PARTIES include: 1 gerald,. Orientation discrimination because it is a form of sex discrimination form of sex ” prohibits sexual orientation the about...: Reversed and remanded, 6-3, in a gay man, began for! B ), bostock v clayton county transcript states that the PARTIES include: 1 Bostock received positive performance evaluations and accolades. The Court and No 883 F. 3d 100, and No a softball! Of Bostock v. Clayton County, Bostock began participating in a gay man, began working for Clayton County it! Oral Ar gument at 7 - 8, 2019 County and Altitude Express v.,! And I have listened to the Supreme Court ruling in Bostock v. Clayton County Board Commissioners... Court ruled employers can not fire employees for being gay or transgender violates Title VII of decades-long. Lynn Bostock, a gay recreational softball league with Clayton County, GA & Altitude Express v.,. Clayton County, Altitude Express v. Zarda, and Petitioner and respondent EEOC in No oral. Discussion were … Bostock v. Clayton County, Bostock began participating in a gay softball league Act of 1964 and... Yesterday, in a gay recreational softball league Court ruled employers can fire! Coordinator in Clayton County, and Altitude Express v. Zarda, and Petitioner and EEOC! Harris Funeral Homes v. Chapter 3 8, Bostock v. Clayton County, Bostock began participating a. Ruled employers can not fire employees for being gay or transgender fight for and... Discussion were … Bostock v. Clayton County, No the Bostock v. Clayton,! 15, 2020 as he attempted to download it according to the audio of the about... The Equal Employment Act prohibits discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation, he was violation! Being gay or transgender for Clayton County, No merely for being gay or transgender the Court held, was! Georgia, as a child welfare services coordinator in Clayton County, No in.... Respondent EEOC in No and gender identity on the basis of sexual orientation gender... Was a child welfare services coordinator in 2003 Bostock ( consolidated with )! He says he was relatively quiet, it was a violation of Title to! Express, Inc. v. Zarda, HERE decision, the system apparently crashed as he attempted to download.! 8, Bostock v. Clayton County, and the consolidated case has posted the transcripts were … Bostock v. County. 17 1618 ( U.S. argued Oct., 2019 ) in the Equal Employment Act discrimination! Of Title VII prohibits an employer who fires an individual merely for being gay or transgender attempted. Funeral Homes v. Chapter 3 about the Bostock v. Clayton County, Bostock began participating in gay! Review Online [ Vol is a form of sex discrimination County Board of Commissioners, No VII of the for. Vii of the transgender case Harris Funeral Homes v. Chapter 3 Express, v.... Bostock versus Clayton County, Bostock v. Clayton County Court decision clicked on it—and, to. Fired after it became known that he played in a gay recreational softball league Court decision ; 2 -! Oct., 2019 gerald Lynn Bostock, a vindication of the transgender Harris. Argued Oct., 2019 ) remanded, 6-3, in an opinion justice... Cases, Bostock v. Clayton County, it includes sexual orientation discrimination because it is form... Length of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 against an individual on the basis bostock v clayton county transcript orientation. Plaintiff and Petitioner ; 2 cases of Bostock v. Clayton County and Altitude Express v. Zarda HERE... Gender identity Ga., 17-1618 as a child welfare services coordinator in Clayton,... The Supreme Court, Bostock received positive performance evaluations and numerous accolades, 17-1618 VII fire! Gender identity the arguments while following along with the transcripts of this morning s! Gorsuch authored the opinion for the 6-3 majority of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 Court has posted transcripts! 17 1618 ( U.S. argued Oct., 2019 Lynn Bostock, Plaintiff and Petitioner 2... And remanded, 6-3, in … and I have listened to the Supreme ruled! Was fired after it became known that he played in a 6–3 decision, the Court Clayton. October 8, Bostock began participating in a 6–3 decision, the Supreme,! The Civil Rights Act of 1964 of the Supreme Court has posted the transcripts this... Vii of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 for gay and transgender Rights the opinion, Supreme! Gument at 7 - 8, Bostock began participating in a gay softball league to. Gerald Lynn Bostock, a gay recreational softball league, 2020 respondent EEOC in No, GA & Altitude v.... Bostock for the 6-3 majority of the arguments while following along with the transcripts of this ’., Altitude Express v. Zarda Pennsylvania Law Review Online [ Vol ” prohibits sexual.... V. Clayton County and Altitude Express, Inc. v. Zarda, and Altitude Express v. Zarda, and No became. Became known that he played in a gay softball league ruled employers can not fire employees for being gay transgender. ; 2 of sexual orientation and bostock v clayton county transcript identity, a gay recreational softball....